The taxpayer filed a judicial claim two (2) days after it filed its administrative claim for refund
or tax credit for unutilized input Value-added tax (VAT). The CIR claims that the CTA has no
jurisdiction to entertain the petition for failure to await the expiration of the 120-day period
provided under Section 112(C) of the 1997 National Internal Revenue Code. (NIRC) The
taxpayer is of the view that the two year-period prescriptive period applies to both
administrative and judicial claims and that the 120 day-period in Section 112 of NIRC is only
directory and need not be complied when the 2-year prescriptive period is about to expire.
The Court ruled that the petition was prematurely filed and the taxpayer lacks cause of
action. Petition for Review before the CTA for refund should be filed within thirty (30) days
from the receipt of the decision of the CIR or upon the expiration of the one hundred twenty
(120) days in case of inaction of the CIR. Thus, it failed to exhaust the administrative remedy
which is a condition precedent before taking judicial action. (Crescent Park 19-1 Property
Holdings, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CTA Case No. 8057, December
07, 20111)
Ignorance is the basic foundation of graft and corruption. The BIR-corrupt brigade is maximizing its full potential and profitability. Fishes find strength, courage and competence in numbers. They had conquered their predators/enemies by grouping together in order to make them bigger than their enemies. You too can become bigger than the fear that lingered in your minds and hearts. Join 'JuanTALKS' now and share your knowledge and experiences to other Filipinos.
Thursday, 3 March 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment