When you recon a law with a standard, you raped the law.

 When you recon a law with a standard, you compromised the law and definitely, you confirmed that you violated such law. The 'S' from the PFRS and PSA refers to SUGGESTIONS. My standards may differ from your standards but we will not go to jail for that differences. However, when your act differs from the language of the law, you will end up in jail. Your compliance with the law is not subject to compromise, just like, your breathing. Furthermore, when you sign any tax return, you, under the pains of PERJURY, declared that its contents are in accordance with the law (TAX CODE) and not in accordance with PFRS or PSA. You are becoming inconsistent if after you signed a tax return, you will later tell the BIR that the facts and figures shown therein are based on PFRS or PSA. Thus, a crime of perjury will set in. THE LAW MAKES US CIVILISED PEOPLE. No types of STANDARDS MAY REPLACE A RELEVANT LAW. ETM is still looking for a Supreme Court's decision that is based on PFRS and PSA. Please help him locate one. Thanks.